Jim Smiley, an old friend and fellow musician, has just taken up the reins of the Material Writers Sig publication, Between the Keys. As part of an upcoming series of articles in BTK, he asked me to write a short perspective on the editing process. It’s short and given below in its entirety.
The editing process is a complex interaction between the writer(s) and editor(s) with the goal of producing a work that is not only a source of pride for all parties, but is also a product that can be sold profitably in the marketplace. This interaction depends on many factors including the temperament and style of the editors, the experience of the writers, the size of the company and the target market, the type of material, the length of time available for the project and much more. No two projects are exactly the same and one of the joys of both the editing and the writing process is the constant learning that takes place on all sides as people adjust to each others’ expectations and needs. Sometimes, the editor and writer can seem to be on different times as they debate the small and big issues and try to get their own message accepted. The writer may perceive that the editor is not aware of all the important details such as the dynamics of the classroom, the details of the pedagogy, or the sheer amount of time that has been spent on a particular activity. Conversely, the editor may occasionally perceive that the writer is not aware of all the important little details such as dealing with artists, translators, and layout people, while simultaneously coordinating with marketing and promotion managers to ensure that the product is part of the big picture. So it is natural that conflicts can arise during the editing process as these dynamics play out, and happily in most circumstances the resolution of these dynamics leads to learning by all, and eventually leads to real learning in the classroom when those materials are in the hands of learners.